Essentially the book contrasts William Henry Harrison - as a Deist - with Tenskwatawa, the Shawnee Prophet. I think it tells the story very well and corrects a number of assumptions made by historians in the past. One of those assumptions had to do with witchcraft; and in particular, the "role" it might play in a community. In the past, historians have asserted that witch hunts allow a comunity to set boundaries of appropriate behavior or somehow aid in conflict resolution, but Adam Jortner doesn't buy it. In an e-mail to me he said:
[I]f religious ideas only have social functions, then religion basically *is* sociology, when you get down to it, and although religion has many social functions, I don't think it's ALL social functions.I get the impression from reading the book that Adam Jortner, on the one hand, has a lot of respect for religion, but, on the other hand, he doesn't study religion per se. What he studies is people's religious beliefs that make up the contents of American history.
So I don't think the witch hunt had a "role." I think the Delawares...had fears about witches, and the purpose of the hunt was to initiate a supernatural war against them. I think Tenskwatawa was invited because of his presumed supernatural powers, and while he benefitted politically from the event, I don't think he manipulated the proceedings--I think he also was concerned about witches.
In my opinion, the witch hunts aren't a front for something else--they are just hunts for witches.
I feature lots of books on this blog that I don't (explicitly) recommend to you, the reader. Unfortunately, lots of books written by history professors don't make for good reads for those of us who aren't history professors. I think The Gods of Prophetstown is an exception. It is more readable than the vast majority of books of its kind.
See the book review and author interview in Indian Country Today magazine.
No comments :
Post a Comment